Skip to content
Fowler Lab
Fowler Lab

Predicting antibiotic resistance de novo

  • News
  • Research
    • Overview
    • Manifesto
    • Software
    • Reproducibility
    • Publications
  • Members
  • Teaching
  • Contact
    • PhDs
  • Wiki
Fowler Lab
Fowler Lab

Predicting antibiotic resistance de novo

New paper: how well can we predict AMR in tuberculosis samples?

Philip Fowler, 16th December 202516th December 2025

This paper just published in Microbial Genomics examines how well our software tool, gnomonicus, predicts to which antibiotics a clinical sample that has been whole-genome sequenced is resistant. To do so, it implements the second edition of the WHO catalogue of resistance-associated mutations (WHOv2) which in turn we had to, in effect, translate from the original Excel and PDF report. Hence we are partly checking our implementation of WHOv2.

Now we had originally wanted to call the tool gnomon as that is the part of a sundial that casts the shadow (thereby following our timekeeping theme: clockwork, sundial) but unfortunately by the time we registered the project on PyPi that name was taken so we ended up with gnomonicus which is a bit of a mouthful.

To characterise its performance, we created a dataset of 2,663 samples that is large enough to give a reasonable idea of performance partly by ensuring there is a good mix of resistance and susceptibility for all 15 antibiotics included in WHOv2. As a further check, we also compared the results of our approach with the results of TB-Profiler which is currently probably the best known TB tool. What was very gratifying was that out of the 13,821 predictions made by both tools, only 63 were truly discrepant (in the sense that one tool called Resistant and the other Susceptible for a drug) and when you dig into these you find that they are nearly all due to differences in the variants called by the upstream pipelines, rather than differences in how we have interpreted WHOv2.

That said, there are some clear differences in interpretation; for example we chose to return a result of Unknown if a mutation in a gene associated with resistance was detected that is not listed in WHOv2 as there is a non-zero chance that it confers resistance. This really illustrates the lack of guidance in the WHOv2 report on how to apply the catalogue in a real world scenario.

Our AMR prediction software stack (including gnomonicus and our implementation of WHOv2) is included in the Myco pipeline which is deployed in EIT GPAS — you can sign up and try it out here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

antimicrobial resistance clinical microbiology gpas publication research tuberculosis

Post navigation

Previous post

Related Posts

antimicrobial resistance

AMyGDA now available from GitHub

27th January 202027th January 2020

AMyGDA is a python module that analyses photographs of 96-well plates and, by examining each…

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Read More
antimicrobial resistance

New paper: predicting pyrazinamide resistance

20th March 202420th March 2024

This paper has finally been published and you can find it here. It had a…

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Read More
antimicrobial resistance

CRyPTIC datasets available through new website

25th June 20257th July 2025

The CRyPTIC project ran from 2016 to 2022 and collected >20,000 clinical samples from patients…

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Read More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
    ©2026 Fowler Lab | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes