New preprint: validating antibiotic resistance prediction in our Myco pipeline Philip Fowler, 9th November 202413th January 2025 Over the last 18 months or so we’ve been designing, coding and testing a Mycobacterial genetics processing pipeline (which we call Myco for short). This pipeline has been deployed on the EIT Pathogena cloud platform and is free for academic researchers and LMICs to use. One can upload raw genetics files (FASTQ) from a putative Mycobacterial sample and the pipeline will determine what Mycobacterial species are present and, if there are enough M. tuberculosis reads, produce a consensus genome to which it will apply the second edition of the WHO catalogue of resistance-associated variants (WHOv2) to produce an antibiogram. Finally it will compare the genome to all others uploaded and return a list of other samples that could be epidemiologically related (that the user has permission to view). Since one cannot directly apply WHOv2 to a sample, one must first translate it into a form that can be used by a computational tool. In this preprint, we focus on assessing the performance of our translation for 15 different antibiotics using a diverse testset of 2,663 publicly available M. tuberculosis samples — these were chosen to have as balanced a resistance profile as possible. We find comparable performance to that reported in the WHOv2 report. We also make several enhancements; these include return a result of Fail if there are insufficient reads at a genetic locus associated with resistance, returning an Unknown result if a mutation in a resistance gene not in the catalogue is encountered and finally calling Resistant if three or more reads at a locus support the identification of one the resistance-associated variants from the catalogues. The last improvement is based on work done by Alice Brankin during her DPhil. Finally, since the dataset of 2,663 samples can be downloaded by anyone and our results can also be found in the attendant GitHub repository, we hope that this could form the basis of testing and benchmarking new catalogues and tools. This is not currently possible since the WHOv2 Training Dataset is not publicly available. You can read the preprint here. Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Related antimicrobial resistance clinical microbiology research tuberculosis
antimicrobial resistance Genetics and Tuberculosis: A Case of New Meets Old 12th July 2019 I was very pleased to be invited to contribute to this “Voices” article organised by… Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Read More
antimicrobial resistance BashTheBug.net Beta Testing Results 5th April 20175th August 2018 Zooniverse have finished beta-testing my BashTheBug citizen science project. To verify that the task is… Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Read More
clinical microbiology New paper: Addressing pandemic-wide systematic errors in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny 9th February 20269th February 2026 Zam Iqbal, at the University of Bath, led this epic study published today in Nature… Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Read More